PacketStream vs ScrapeOwl
A data-driven, head-to-head comparison of PacketStream and ScrapeOwl for 2026 - pricing, IP network, country coverage, proxy types, reviews, and support, so you can pick the right fit for your use case.
Verdict: which is better?
ScrapeOwl is a scraping API with parsing and JS rendering (from $29). PacketStream gives you raw, affordable pay-as-you-go residential proxies from $1.00/GB (4.7 on 150). Pick ScrapeOwl for a managed scrape-and-parse endpoint; pick PacketStream for cheap residential proxies you control.
- Entry price
- Countries
- Founded
- Proxy types
- Compliance
PacketStream vs ScrapeOwl: head-to-head
| Feature | PacketStream | ScrapeOwl |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $1 per GB | $29 per monthly |
| Proxy types | Residential | Datacenter, Residential |
| IP pool | Millions | - |
| Countries | 190 | 15 |
| Trustpilot | 4.7 (150) | - |
| Overall rating | 4.7 | - |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Money-back | No | No |
| Support channels | 1/3 | 1/3 |
| Compliance | 0/3 | 1/3 |
| Headquarters | US | United States |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
Pricing and specs are pulled from our latest data for each provider. Verify current pricing on the provider site before purchase.
PacketStream vs ScrapeOwl FAQ
Is PacketStream cheaper than ScrapeOwl?
PacketStream has the lower entry price at $1 per GB, compared with $29 per monthly for ScrapeOwl. Always size the cost to your real monthly usage, since per-GB and per-IP plans scale differently.
Which has more locations, PacketStream or ScrapeOwl?
PacketStream advertises the wider footprint with 190 countries versus 15 for ScrapeOwl.
PacketStream vs ScrapeOwl: which should you choose?
Choose PacketStream if you want affordable pay-as-you-go residential proxies; choose ScrapeOwl if you want web scraping api with custom element parsing and js rendering. The head-to-head above breaks down price, network, and ratings so you can match the winner to your workload.