ScrapeOwl vs WebScrapingAPI
A data-driven, head-to-head comparison of ScrapeOwl and WebScrapingAPI for 2026 - pricing, IP network, country coverage, proxy types, reviews, and support, so you can pick the right fit for your use case.
Verdict: which is better?
Both are scraping APIs. ScrapeOwl is a lightweight scrape-and-parse API with JS rendering (from $29). WebScrapingAPI adds rotating residential proxies and anti-bot handling at scale (from ~$49/mo, 3.1 on 7). Choose ScrapeOwl for cheaper, simple scraping; choose WebScrapingAPI for broader managed scraping with anti-bot.
- Proxy types
- Founded
- Entry price
- Countries
- Compliance
ScrapeOwl vs WebScrapingAPI: head-to-head
| Feature | ScrapeOwl | WebScrapingAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $29 per monthly | $5.20 per GB |
| Proxy types | Datacenter, Residential | Residential |
| IP pool | - | Millions |
| Countries | 15 | 195 |
| Trustpilot | - | 3.1 (7) |
| Overall rating | - | 3.1 |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Money-back | No | No |
| Support channels | 1/3 | 1/3 |
| Compliance | 1/3 | 2/3 |
| Headquarters | United States | Romania |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
Pricing and specs are pulled from our latest data for each provider. Verify current pricing on the provider site before purchase.
ScrapeOwl vs WebScrapingAPI FAQ
Is ScrapeOwl cheaper than WebScrapingAPI?
WebScrapingAPI has the lower entry price at $5.20 per GB, compared with $29 per monthly for ScrapeOwl. Always size the cost to your real monthly usage, since per-GB and per-IP plans scale differently.
Which has more locations, ScrapeOwl or WebScrapingAPI?
WebScrapingAPI advertises the wider footprint with 195 countries versus 15 for ScrapeOwl.
ScrapeOwl vs WebScrapingAPI: which should you choose?
Choose ScrapeOwl if you want web scraping api with custom element parsing and js rendering; choose WebScrapingAPI if you want developers and businesses requiring reliable web scraping apis and rotating residential proxies with high success rates. The head-to-head above breaks down price, network, and ratings so you can match the winner to your workload.

